The Jewish War Series (Part 12): Zealot Terrorism in Jerusalem, Chaos in Rome, and a Two-Year Delay to the War

As Vespasian bided his time in Caesarea, things were playing out just as he had expected in Jerusalem—the zealots were tearing each other apart, and in the process, plunging the city further and further into bloody chaos and desolation. John of Gischala, began to act more and more like a tyrant among the zealots and…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 12): Conclusions–The Fundamentalist Plummer in an Art Gallery

We now come to my final post in my extended book analysis of Bart Ehrman’s How Jesus Became God. In this post I will cover Ehrman’s last two chapters, as well as the epilogue. Chapter 8 is entitled, “After the New Testament: Christological Dead Ends of the Second and Third Centuries,” Chapter 9 is entitled,…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 11)–Jesus: What and Angel!

We are now in the home stretch of my extended book analysis of Bart Ehrman’s How Jesus Became God. In this post, I will be covering chapter 7, entitled, “Jesus as God on Earth (Early Incarnation Christologies).” In a nutshell, what Ehrman argues in this chapter is the following: A few of Jesus’ followers had…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 10): Ehrman’s Attempt to Explain an Evolving Christology

The sixth chapter of Bart Ehrman’s How Jesus Became God is entitled, “The Beginning of Christology: Christ as Exalted to Heaven.” As the title suggests, the chapter attempts to essentially trace the development of early Christian Christology regarding just who Jesus was. Remember, the title of the book is How Jesus Became God—and what Ehrman…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 9): What Does Ehrman Know About the Resurrection of Jesus? Turns out, not much…

In chapter 5 of his book, How Jesus Became God, Bart Ehrman discusses “what we can know” about the resurrection of Jesus. Of course, given the fact that in the previous chapter where Ehrman makes the argument that there probably wasn’t an empty tomb because Jesus probably wasn’t even given a proper burial, one would…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 8): No Empty Tomb and no Joseph of Arimathea

The earliest Christians didn’t claim Jesus was physically resurrected. There is no way to know if there was an empty tomb. There probably wasn’t even a tomb to begin with because Jesus probably was either never buried at all or was thrown into a mass grave with other people who were executed by the Romans….

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 7): Resurrection? You’re Talking About Resurrection?

In chapter 4 of Bart Ehrman’s book, How Jesus Became God, focuses on what Ehrman believes we cannot know about the resurrection of Jesus. Early on in the chapter, Ehrman makes the distinction between belief in the resurrection of Jesus and the actual resurrection of Jesus. Thus, even though Ehrman correctly says, “Belief in Jesus’s…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 6): Sources, Shell Games…and How Jesus Wasn’t the Son of Man?

When it comes to assessing which parts of the Gospels are historically credible and which aren’t, Bart Ehrman adheres to the generally accepted methods of biblical scholarship that, in and of themselves, are perfectly fine and reasonable. In a nutshell, the criterion Ehrman uses is the following: The Criterion of Independent Attestation: If a story…

Continue reading →

Bart Ehrman’s “How Jesus Became God” (Part 5): Why Ehrman doesn’t think the Gospels are historically reliable….

After a temporary diversion into addressing Richard Carrier and the “mythicist movement,” I am now getting back to my extended book analysis of Bart Ehrman’s How Jesus Became God. In this post, I will begin to look at chapter 3 in HJBG, where Ehrman discusses whether or not Jesus believed he was God. Well then,…

Continue reading →

Richard Carrier and the Mythical Jesus (Part 4): Mythical Carriers and Ark Encounters–How Richard Carrier and Ken Ham are the Captains of the Same Titanic

Up until about three weeks ago, I really hadn’t paid much attention to Richard Carrier and the “mythicist movement.” I knew a little bit about his claims, but simply didn’t feel it was worth the hassle. And then (as I mentioned in the first post of this series) I got into a rather silly and…

Continue reading →