Partisanship (Part 3): A Dan McClellan BONUS! (And a springboard into another book analysis)

As fate would have it, over this past week while I have been writing two posts inspired a couple things Peter Enns posted regarding MAGA pastors and the issue of partisanship, I have also begun reading Dan McClellan’s new book, The Bible Says So? Recently, he did some sort of podcast with Enns about his…

Continue reading →

Peter Enns, MAGA Pastors, and Partisanship…and Syncretism (Part 2): What is the source of the current partisan divide?

In my last post, I made a few comments regarding two posts Peter Enns recently put out regarding a few “MAGA pastors.” And while I agree with him for the most part in his criticism of these pastors, it got me thinking about what I feel is an underlying problem within Evangelicalism and ex-Evangelicalism alike:…

Continue reading →

Peter Enns, MAGA Pastors, and Partisanship…and Syncretism…and Prophets (and what I think is a major problem within Evangelicalism and ex-Evangelicalism these days)

It has been over two months since I’ve last written anything on my blog. The end of the school year, as well as a few other contributing factors, has taken up my time. That, plus the fact I simply didn’t have anything pressing to write about. Now that summer is here, I’m going to try…

Continue reading →

“Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning” by Nigel Biggar—A Book Analysis (Part 6: Chapters 6-8—Conclusion and Final Thoughts)

We now come to my final post in my book analysis of Nigel Biggar’s Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning. In this post, I am going to fly through chapters 6-8 and then give my reflections and thoughts on the book as a whole, as well as what I feel are the underlying issues that have made…

Continue reading →

“Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning” by Nigel Biggar: A Book Analysis (Part 5: Chapter 5—Cultural Genocide?)

Here in Part 5 of my book analysis of Nigel Biggar’s Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning, I am primarily going to cover chapter 5 of his book, “Cultural Assimilation and ‘Genocide,’” in which, among other things, he discusses the Canadian residential schools. The issue of these residential schools has been a major flashpoint of controversy on…

Continue reading →

“Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning” by Nigel Biggar—A Book Analysis (Part 4: Chapters 3-4: Was the British Empire essentially racist? Did it take land primarily through conquest?)

At this point in my book analysis of Nigel Biggar’s Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning, in this post, I’m going to provide brief overviews of both Chapter 3 (“Human Equality, Cultural Superiority, and Racism”) and Chapter 4 (“Land, Settlers, and Conquest”). I want to write no more than two posts after this one. Chapter 3: Human…

Continue reading →

“Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning” by Nigel Biggar—A Book Analysis (Part 3: Should we speak of ‘colonialism and slavery’ in the same breath, as if they were the same thing?)

Chapter 2: From Slavery to Anti-Slavery—Summary and ReactionBiggar begins Chapter 2 by pushing back against the current narrative put forth by the likes of the “Rhodes Must Fall” and “Black Lives Matter” movements regarding colonialism and slavery—namely that colonialism and slavery are inseparable and that white supremacy was at the root of it all. Biggar…

Continue reading →

“Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning” by Nigel Biggar—A Book Analysis (Part 2: Was the British Empire Rooted in Greed and the Lust to Dominate?)

With the Introduction of Nigel Biggar’s book Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning out of the way, I am now ready to go through his book, chapter by chapter and trace his fundamental arguments concerning British Imperialism. In this post, I’m tackling chapter 1. Chapter 1: Motives, Good and BadThe first chapter in Nigel Biggar’s book deals…

Continue reading →

“Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning” by Nigel Biggar—A Book Analysis (Part 1)

Earlier this year at Regent College, where I got my first MA in 1995-1997, there was a fairly heated dust-up concerning the British scholar (and Regent alum) Nigel Biggar. The Regius Professor Emeritus of Moral Theology at the University of Oxford, he had been invited to give a lecture about the British Empire and the…

Continue reading →

Candida Moss’s “The Myth of Persecution”–A New Book Analysis Series (Part 5: Eusebius of Caesarea Made Up the Myth of Martyrdom and Apostolic Succession…and conservative Christians and the GOP are bad!)

Here in my final post on Candida Moss’s book, The Myth of Persecution, I will cover Chapter 7: “The Invention of the Persecuted Church,” and Chapter 8: “The Dangerous Legacy of a Martyrdom Complex.” After that, I will give my concluding thoughts to the book as a whole. Chapter 7: The Invention of the Persecuted…

Continue reading →